Times have changed since the era of the $349 Nexus 5 and $499 Nexus 6P; instead, practically every flagship smartphone nowadays, Google’s included, costs at least $800. The $800 Pixel 4 and the $900 Pixel 4 XL feel pretty great in the hand caseless, but if you don’t want to risk damaging your shiny new gadget, a case is a must. A screen protector would be good to have, too.
This roundup will feature a wide variety of cases (and some screen protectors). Each review will contain the pros and cons, a few paragraphs on the experience, and a verdict. We will continually update the list as more cases come in. If there’s a case you’d like to see reviewed, let us know in the comments section and we’ll try to get a sample for review.
Introducing Spigen’s newest Pixel 4 and 4 XL case lineup — tailored to best fit your style and protection needs. From the exciting new details in style, to the extra protection packed into the slim frame, Spigen delivers the quality and slim protection it is known for.
Whether you are a minimalist who loves a simple look, a lover of style who values detailing, or a dropper who needs the most protection, whatever the case may be, Spigen has a case that is perfect for you. Check out Spigen’s Pixel 4 and 4 XL lineup right now.
Note: This sponsorship has no bearing on the following reviews.
Having tried out Bellroy’s offerings for both the Pixel 2 and Pixel 3, I had a good idea of what to expect going into this Pixel 4 version. As anticipated, not much has changed, meaning that it still isn’t a particularly good case. Those looking for a leather Pixel 4 case should probably take a look at the less imperfect Nomad Rugged Case, reviewed below, instead.
I really hate to bash on Bellroy for the third year in a row, but the reality is that the cases just don’t seem very well-designed or well-made. The highlight here should obviously be the leather, but it’s really some of the cheapest-feeling leather I’ve felt. It’s extremely dry and devoid of that true leather feel. I’d say it’s a bit better than last year’s thanks to a slightly finer grain, but that’s really not saying much. The only upside of this leather is that it seems more resistant to scratching and denting than what Nomad uses.
The rest of the case isn’t much better. The border not only feels cheap, but is also very thin, meaning that it isn’t great for shock absorption. The lip up front does clear a glass screen protector, but it’s thin in a way that makes it uncomfortable to hold and even swipe on and off the screen. The buttons, like previous iterations, are simply cutouts. The Bellroy border is thin, but not thin enough to make button cutouts work correctly. As a result, pressing buttons becomes a chore. The other cutouts are decent.
Bellroy must be turning a decent profit on these if it’s been using the same subpar design and materials for so many generations. However, I just can’t recommend this when the much better Nomad Rugged Case is also on the market. Yeah, the Bellroy is $5-10 cheaper than the Nomad, but that’s $5-10 I would gladly pay for a far nicer experience. The Pixel 4 model costs $40, with the 4 XL version coming in at $5 higher. Both variants are available in black, caramel, graphite, and coral.
Verdict: Buy the Nomad Rugged Case instead.
There aren’t all that many protection-oriented cases with clear backs on the market, so I was curious to see what Catalyst would deliver with its creatively named Impact Protection Case, especially given the steeper $40 price point. For diehard fans of clear backs, I think this case is worth the money.
The first thing I noticed after putting this Catalyst case on my Pixel 4 was just how beefy the border is. It’s much thicker than most other cases, and it’s constructed of a slightly flexible rubber material. The case is very tight, but the added security that offers far outweighs the slight inconvenience of being a bit more difficult to install and remove. The lip up front is thick, and it does clear a glass screen protector. I feel pretty confident in Catalyst’s 3-meter drop-proof claim.
I’m a fan of how my white Pixel 4 looks through the clear back. The black border around the entire case and the camera module gives it some nice contrast, though the clear back does come with all the caveats of one. It scratches fairly easily and isn’t great at resisting fingerprints. The buttons are tactile and easy to push, though they look a bit cheap and uninspired. Cutouts seem alright, and the only branding is on the bottom right side near the lanyard loop. Speaking of which, you do get a lanyard included in the box, which is nice if you’re into that sort of thing.
If you’re in the market for a protective clear case that doesn’t try super hard to look rugged and tough, the Catalyst is probably your best bet. No, it’s not affordable at $39.99, but it’s hard to find a good-looking clear case that’s this protective. However, you should note that the clear back is prone to scratches and fingerprints like pretty much every other clear case. These aren’t too noticeable on the white or orange Pixel 4s, but I would caution against getting one of these for a black phone. It’s only available with a black border.
Verdict: Buy it if you want a protective case that shows off the phone’s design.
ZAGG is a pretty widely known screen protector company, but it recently branched out to cases under the name Gear4. As it turns out, Gear4 isn’t actually a new company, but I had never heard of it prior to its acquisition by ZAGG. My first look at Gear4’s offerings was with the Battersea, a confusingly named case that, in actuality, has nothing to do with extending battery life. Shame, as that would have been ideal for the Pixel 4.
Let’s start off with the Battersea’s looks. The pattern on the back is certainly eye-catching, designed to mimic a ripple effect circulating from the Gear4 branding. While this isn’t my preferred look for a phone case, I can certainly see how it might appeal to some. Protection is where this case is supposed to shine; ZAGG mentions the D3O material everywhere, even including a small bit of text underneath the camera module. This material is allegedly very strong even though it’s not very thick, and a 16-foot drop rating is quoted. That sounds impressive, though I’d imagine there’s a point of diminishing returns when it comes to drop protection. After all, not many people are dropping their phones two stories, but it’s definitely good that ZAGG is this confident in the case and the material. The border itself is extremely grippy, though it doesn’t feel very premium. The lip is able to clear a glass screen protector with ease.
I did notice one pretty big issue with the drop protection, though. Because the case doesn’t hold the phone very tightly, drops with the screen down could lead to the case partially coming off the phone. This sort of renders the chunky lip useless, as it’s not really protecting the screen if the case dislodges upon impact. As for other things of note: it’s not particularly bulky, but it can’t be considered slim either. The buttons are nothing special – they’re tactile like most, and they’re not especially easy or difficult to press. Cutouts are decent, though the ones for the grilles on the bottom of the phone seem a bit oversized. The camera module is nicely sunken in for a bit of protection, with the aforementioned D3O branding right below.
There’s one other critical issue with the Battersea: the price. $49.99 is a ton of money for a case with no real special qualities; the D3O material is kind of moot if the case can’t stay on the phone when dropped. Sure, the pattern on the back is interesting, and the grippy TPU is easy to hang onto, but there should be more to talk about for a $50 case. I might have been able to recommend it if it were $10-15 cheaper and the case’s fit were tighter, but as it stands, this is a no-go from me.
Verdict: Don’t buy it – it’s too much money for an imperfect case.
It can be difficult to find a nice clear case, and I’m disappointed to report that the Gear4 Crystal Palace is not one of the good ones. The name is probably the best part of this case, as it falls flat on its face in many important regards. There aren’t many cases I outright cannot recommend, but this is one of them.
I won’t sugarcoat it — the Crystal Palace is genuinely one of the worst cases I have ever used. Name a category, and I’ll explain why it’s terrible in that regard. Protection? Sure, it has that fancy D3O tech, but I should hope it’s able to protect itself given just how slippery it is. It’s truly almost impossible to get a firm grip on this case. The lip is thick enough to clear a glass screen protector, but thanks to the case’s subpar fit, a face-down fall could result in the case’s corners giving way and your screen cracking. The case also creaks when you use it.
Cutouts and buttons are two areas in which pretty much every case does decently enough in, but not the Crystal Palace. For some reason, the cutouts on the bottom of the phone are always crooked and generally terrible-looking. I initially thought this was because of how I was putting it on, but nope – it’s just a poor design. The buttons are excruciatingly difficult to press; they’re easily the worst I’ve used on any Pixel 4 case so far. As a bonus, the effort required to push the buttons usually results in the phone slipping due to the sheer lack of grip. This is definitely a juxtaposition between the other Gear4 case I tested, the Battersea, which is the grippiest case I’ve used. The back seems somewhat scratch-resistant, but it gathers fingerprints easily.
The Crystal Palace has practically no redeeming qualities, and yet ZAGG charges a princely $39.99 for one. I legitimately would not use this case even if you paid me to – it’s that bad. If you want a decent clear case and are willing to spend the dough for one, you would be much better served by the Catalyst Impact Protection case, for which there is a review above.
Verdict: Don’t buy it.
Fabric isn’t a material that’s ordinarily associated with phone cases, but Google apparently didn’t mind that fact when it released its first Fabric Case for the Pixel 2. Fast forward to today, and the Fabric Case is now on its third iteration for the Pixel 4. It’s still one of my favorite cases for the Pixel lineup, even with its flaws.
Let’s talk about how it compares to the Pixel 3 version. Both utilize nylon-polyester fabric, a plastic power button, fabric-covered volume buttons, as well as a microfiber lining. The buttons feel a bit harder to press to me, which is unfortunate. I prefer the fabric weaves and designs on the Pixel 4 cases, as they’re just a bit more distinctive.
Protection-wise, the Pixel 4 version has actually gotten worse. Because of the two grilles on the bottom of the phone (only one is for a speaker, but whatever), the bottom has to be a lot wider and less protective. As a direct result of this, the case isn’t as tight on the phone and would be more prone to coming off if the phone fell face down, making screen damage more likely. I did notice that the lip seems to be slightly thicker, though it’s still not really enough to clear a glass screen protector.
While I do consider the Pixel 4 Fabric Case a downgrade from the Pixel 3 one, especially in the protection arena, I’d still buy it based on the cool factor alone. If you drop your phone and/or get your hands dirty often, this probably isn’t the case for you, but if you like the way it looks, there’s nothing else like it on the market. It costs $40 from the Google Store and comes in Sorta Smoky, Just Black, Blue-ish, and Could be Coral.
Verdict: Buy it if you like the look.
Buy: Google Store
Incipio has been around for a long time, and from my experience, its cases are always decent, but fairly uninteresting. The same story is true for the Pixel 4’s DualPro, but hey, boring isn’t such a bad thing for a phone case.
The first thing you notice about the DualPro is just how, well, bland it is. It legitimately looks like a bar of soap, save for the Incipio branding on the lower right of the back. The matte finish on the hard back layer is comfortable and does a pretty good job at hiding fingerprints and oils in general, but when it does get marks, you have to use a lot of pressure with a microfiber to get them off. All corners of the phone are well-protected, and the lip up front is actually pretty tall — more than enough to clear a glass screen protector. It is worth noting that the case must be taken apart to be installed, but it’s just two pieces — nothing difficult.
The rest of the case is pretty plain-jane. The buttons are above average; they’re nice and clicky. Cutouts are nicely sized and line up properly. The top of the front lip is actually slightly shaved to accommodate for vertical swipes, but it’s not really necessary in my experience. The camera is protected without the need for a bump, meaning that the phone sits flat.
If you’re just looking for a nice, protective case that doesn’t stand out — and a lot of people are — the DualPro is one to consider. Even though it doesn’t utilize the outlandishly rugged styling that some other cases have, it’s a lot more capable than many of those. Its $29.99 price tag might seem a bit high on paper, but I think it’s worth it. The case only comes in black; there is a clear version, but I suspect it’s a much different case from this one.
Verdict: Buy it if you want something rugged without the rugged looks.
There aren’t many people out there who prioritize exotic materials and form in general over function, but for people who really want their Pixel 4 to stand out, Pittsburgh-based Kerf will sell you a one-piece wood case with a number of wood species to choose from. These aren’t cheap, but they’re probably the most unique cases on the market.
Wood is obviously not a logical material for a phone case. It’s not very shock-absorbent or flexible, it’s difficult to work with, it adds bulk to the phone… I could go on. But it does stand out like no other case, and if you’re into specialty goods, you’ll probably want one of these.
As a case, this doesn’t offer the greatest functionality. Installation is simple enough, with suede on the interior holding the phone in via friction, though removal is tricky. I found that slowly pushing from the camera module is the only way to get the case off. Coverage is decent, with all four corners and a sizable lip, though I wouldn’t be surprised if the case itself sustained damage from a bigger drop. Kerf does offer 50% off if you return a broken case and reorder another, but this is by no means a protective case in the first place in spite of the bulk. Cutouts are large, and the buttons are very clicky, albeit a bit sharp on the edges.
Kerf offers 15 different types of wood, ranging from a $69 cherry option to a $169 figured sapele offering. You can even have custom text or an image CNC engraved onto the back. The ones pictured here are the cherry and the $99 bulletwood case. Kerf is offering 10% off Pixel 4 cases with code PREORDER at checkout right now, which does help a bit, but these are some of the priciest cases out there. You’ve got to pay to play.
Verdict: Buy it if you’ve got the dough and prefer form over function.
I’ve been a fan of Moment’s phone cases since I first used them with the Pixel 2 XL. Although they’re primarily a means of using Moment’s rather expensive camera lenses, they also happen to just be good cases on their own. The Pixel 4 variant is no different.
As with all Moment cases, my preference is always the wood backing. The canvas option isn’t bad either, but the walnut just adds an extra bit of flair. Engraved in the wood is a subtle “Long live the picture taker” text, with an also-subtle Moment logo above the wood. The rest of the case is made of a comfortable rubberized material that has a nice matte, fingerprint-resistant finish. All four corners are well-protected, and the lip up front is enough to clear a screen protector. Plus, the lip at the bottom of the phone is lower than the rest to allow for the Pixel 4’s home/recents swipe — a very thoughtful and useful addition.
The area around the camera module on the back is a bit funky-looking, but this, of course, is to allow use of camera lenses. The lens can be screwed over either the standard and telephoto cameras, and there’s a nice little alignment line on the side of the case to assist with installation. I had no issues with using my lenses, which is no surprise given that Moment makes both the case and the lenses. The buttons are standard-issue; they’re not particularly easy to press, but they’re still tactile. Cutouts are nicely sized. I also appreciate the symmetrical lanyard holes on either side of the bottom.
The fact that I would recommend this case even to those with no intention of purchasing a Moment lens should indicate how much I like this case. It is pricey at $40, but it’s otherwise a pretty perfect, nicely designed case. If you’re thinking about picking one up, I would definitely recommend the walnut wood option over the canvas; it just makes the case more special.
Verdict: Buy it if you can shell out the $40.
Having been disappointed with Bellroy’s offerings for the Pixel 3, I was thrilled when I found out how nice Nomad’s Rugged Case was by comparison. Unfortunately, this year’s Rugged Case has taken a step back in quality, though it’s still probably your best bet for a Pixel 4 leather case.
When I took the Pixel 3 version of the Nomad Rugged Case out of the box last year, I recall being surprised by how supple and grippy the leather felt in comparison to the Bellroy case. I was also surprised when I held the Pixel 4 version for the first time, but for the completely opposite reason. This time around, the leather has a much slipperier texture, making the case feel a lot less premium. Nomad’s site says that it’s still vegetable-tanned Horween leather, and the fine grain still looks good, but it just doesn’t feel nearly as good as it did last year. In spite of this, the leather is still as easy to dent as ever. Fortunately, the leather smell is still prominent.
Leather aside, though, this is actually quite a competent case. It’s very protective, holding onto the phone tighter than most others I’ve tested. The sides are thick enough to provide adequate shock absorption for day-to-day use, but not so much that it’s noticeably wider in the hand. The lip is tall enough to clear a glass screen protector. The inside is lined with microfiber, which is a nice touch. The buttons could stand to protrude from the body a bit more, but they’re alright otherwise. Cutouts are precise, and there are actually two lanyard loops on either side of the bottom of the phone.
The Nomad Rugged Case isn’t as good as last year’s, which means that the already steep $49.95 price isn’t as justifiable anymore. However, the only alternative I’m aware of for the Pixel 4 is the $40 Bellroy Leather Case, which is still inferior to the Nomad in every way except price. Unless you, our dear readers, can recommend another leather Pixel 4 case I don’t know about, the Nomad is probably still the best option. It’s available in black and Rustic Brown.
Verdict: Buy it if you need a leather case.
Most of us know OtterBox for its massive Defender cases, but the company has some less chunky offerings as well. For those who do work in tougher environments but don’t want the bulk of the Defender, the Symmetry appears to be a decent alternative.
First things first: if you care about premium materials, this isn’t the case for you. The back is constructed of hard, textured polycarbonate that feels very cheap. That said, it does seem to be quite durable and scratch-resistant. The rubber inner layer makes up the front of the case, and it does clear a glass screen protector. Cutouts are nice all around, with adequate clearance for the camera and the charging port.
The case itself feels very solid without being too huge. When I went to change a shock out on my car, I grabbed this case, and it did its job well. The rubber did get all greasy, but it washed off easily. The back survived with no blemishes despite being thrown around a bit. I also greatly appreciate the easily pressed buttons, which are probably the best I’ve used on a Pixel 4 case thus far.
At its $51 MSRP, the Symmetry is hard to recommend. The current $36 Amazon price is more palatable, though I’m still unsure if it’s worth, say, 2.5 times a Spigen Tough Armor case. Ultimately, this case definitely isn’t the best value out there any way you dice it, but if you’re after a nicely made case and you work in the field, this is a good option. It’s available in Black, Sapphire Secret Blue, Apsen Gleam Yellow, and a weird Gradient Energy color.
Verdict: Buy it if you like it, but know that it isn’t the best bang for the buck.
Peel is best-known for selling paper-thin phone cases, so I was a bit surprised when some Peel-branded glass screen protectors arrived at my doorstep. Long story short: this is not a good screen protector.
From what I can tell, the only thing that Peel had to do with this screen protector is the box. As soon as you get a look inside, it’s plainly obvious this is the worst type of glass screen protector. It has no adhesive on the actual screen portion, only under the black border area. This usually leads to serious touch sensitivity issues, but it’s pretty much unnoticeable in the Peel’s case. That’s virtually the only good aspect of this product.
Installation is pretty simple, but there’s no alignment tool included. I thought the fitment was alright until I started using the phone, at which point I realized that the black borders actually intrude into the screen space. In Slide for Reddit, for instance, I can barely see the lines on the side indicating which comment replies to which.
The oleophobic coating isn’t great — it’s slippery enough, but it does relatively little to mask fingerprints. It’s not the worst I’ve ever used, but it leaves something to be desired. There’s a small rainbow effect in the middle of the screen — a common side effect of there not being any adhesive. I also noticed that the cutout for the front camera somehow accumulated a ton of dust underneath, despite the fact that I completely cleaned the screen before installation.
This screen protector is not worth anywhere near the $29 it retails for. I have no proof, but it legitimately looks to be an off-the-shelf Chinese product that goes for $0.50 apiece in bulk on Alibaba. The profit margins on this screen protector must be ridiculous — which would be fine, if it were actually a well-rounded product. Sure, it’s quite a bit cheaper than the OtterBox and ZAGG offerings, but there are well-reviewed Pixel 4 glass screen protectors on Amazon for about $2.25 a pop in a 4-pack. There is no world in which I can recommend Peel’s offering.
Verdict: Don’t buy it.
There are a handful of companies that offer shockingly thin cases, and Peel is one of the bigger names in the game. If you’re looking to keep your phone true to its original form but still want just a little bit of protection, Peel’s cases are definitely worth looking into.
I personally love the way the Pixel 4 feels in the hand without a case, and a case like the Peel is pretty much the closest you can get short of something like a dbrand skin. It really almost feels like there’s nothing on the phone. The material is matte and fingerprint-resistant, although it does scratch pretty easily. The buttons are just cutouts, but that’s perfectly acceptable given that the case is just so damn thin. The rest of the cutouts are properly sized as well.
Obviously, this case is very weak on the protection end. Yes, it does fully surround the phone, and it has a bit of a hump to protect the camera, but it’s really not going to protect from much more than scratches or the lightest drops, especially given that there’s no lip up front. I trust it a bit more than a skin, but that’s not saying much. Given the thinness of the material, you do have to be a bit careful when putting it on not to crease it; I found that putting the top 2 corners in first, then the bottom right, and the bottom left last worked best for me.
This case is a prime example of form over function, but it might be worth it for some of you. It isn’t cheap at $29 (or $24 on Amazon), but it seems that MNML and Totallee’s offerings are now priced about the same, if not more. It’s available in “blackout” and silver.
Verdict: Buy it if you like the look.
When I first got into smartphones nearly a decade ago, I recall thinking of Ringke as a direct competitor to Spigen. Spigen’s operation has only grown since then, but Ringke sort of just faded into the background. The company is still producing cases like this Fusion X for the Pixel 4, though I can’t say I’m a fan.
I don’t really like the Fusion X’s design, but I can see how it might appeal to some. It certainly looks rugged with the random geometry and protruding corners, but in reality, it’s no OtterBox. For starters, the case itself is rather thin, and the lip up front is acceptable at best. The top and bottom of the lip are a bit taller than the sides, but drop your phone with this case on its face and it probably won’t fare well. The chunky corners probably do help with drops, but they sort of dig into your hands during use. Additionally, the case is rather difficult to pick up and hold onto because there’s very little surface area on the sides.
Other aspects of the case aren’t particularly praiseworthy, either. The material isn’t very premium and can creak occasionally. The clear back is very prone to showing fingerprints. The cutouts, albeit usable, are imprecise, especially around the camera module. The buttons are wonderfully clicky, but the volume buttons are difficult to locate without looking at the case. For what it’s worth, there is a small hole that you can loop a lanyard through, if that’s your kind of thing.
In a world with so many good cheap cases, the Fusion X just can’t compete. It’s not very protective, doesn’t feel nice in the hands, it’s poorly built… need I go on? The Fusion X retails for $10.99, though there’s a 20% Amazon coupon on it as of publishing time. It’s available in black, Camo Black, and Space Blue.
Verdict: Don’t buy it; there are better cases for the same money.
If there’s one case I knew I could rely on, it’s Speck’s Presidio Grip. I’ve used this model of case with many phones over the years, and the formula has always stayed the same. The Pixel 4 version is exactly as good as I expected, and it’s a great option for most.
Much of this will be a repeat of what I said last year about the Pixel 3 version, but that’s because it’s still just a good case even without any changes. The design is still clean-looking, with the rubber strakes adding some flair (and also grip and shock absorption). The hardshell surround is very solid-feeling with just a bit of flexibility, and the inside has a rubber lining. The corners are reinforced, and the lip up front ensures that your screen stays protected.
As expected, the buttons are nice and tactile — they require a little bit more force to depress than I’d ideally like, but it’s not a dealbreaker by any means. The cutouts are all precise, with good clearance for larger USB-C cables and protection for the massive rear camera module. Speck’s logo is on the top right of the back, as it always is on these cases.
The Presidio Grip is the case I’d grab whenever I’m doing something outdoorsy. That’s not to say it’s unusable for other routines — I just have other, slightly less bulky cases I’d rather use on a daily basis. If you’re a bit of a klutz or just do a lot of work outside, this is a great case. It stickers for $39.99 for both the Pixel 4 and Pixel 4 XL versions, but the Pixel 4 model can currently be had for about $10 off on Amazon. It’s available in black/black, Marble Grey/Anthracite Grey, Bali Blue/Skyline Blue, Coastal Blue/black, and Parrot Pink/Papaya Pink.
Verdict: Buy it if you need something with a bit more protection than your average case.
Spigen is one of the best-known case manufacturers in the business right now, and for good reason — the company consistently produces high-quality, yet affordable cases. The Liquid Air is perhaps one of the best examples, as it’s something that the regular consumer who just wants a good, no-frills case will be entirely happy with.
As you might be able to tell from the lack of a “not so good” section above, I can’t really find any flaws with the Liquid Air. It’s not a fancy case with exotic materials or special features, but it doesn’t try to be one. It’s basically just a pretty protective TPU shell, and that’s all most people will want out of a case. The pattern on the back is very faint, but it does add the tiniest bit of flair. There are also small diagonal ridges on the sides of the case that probably marginally enhance grip. There’s also some unnoticeable Spigen branding near the bottom of one of the sides.
In terms of protection, this is a surprisingly solid case. The sides are stiffer and slightly thicker than the back, assisting with shock absorption and keeping the case tightly wrapped around the phone. The lip easily clears a glass screen protector and makes no attempt to detach from the phone when in a face-down impact, and the camera gets a slightly elevated portion for a bit of extra protection. The buttons are tactile and easy to push, and the cutouts are all quite precise.
The Liquid Air is a good case, plain and simple. It’s protective, it isn’t offensive-looking, and at $11.99, it’s cheap. If you’re the type of person who really doesn’t care what’s on your phone as long as it’s protected, this is a great option. You can have it in any color… as long as it’s black.
Verdict: Buy it if you just want a good, no-frills case.
One of my first Spigen cases was the Neo Hybrid, which I had for both the Nexus 5 and Galaxy Note III. Back then, it had the same basic construction — TPU with a hard plastic outer frame — but there have been a number of changes since then. Though the Neo Hybrid isn’t something I’d buy for myself, it’s still a great case, especially for the money.
The Neo Hybrid covers all of the protection must-haves (material on all four corners, a big front lip, and a rear camera hump). However, it is worth noting that the hard plastic frame likely makes the Neo Hybrid less shock absorbent than most other cases of the same size. The materials are nice; the TPU back has an interesting crosshatch pattern, and the gunmetal frame has a shiny finish that is resistant to fingerprints. This frame isn’t made of the most grippy material, though, so some might find the phone difficult to pick up and/or hold onto. I didn’t have this issue, but it seems like a relatively common complaint on Amazon. There is some Spigen branding on the back, and “Neo Hybrid” is carved into the side. Like with all other Spigen cases I’ve tried out, the cutouts are well-sized and accurate.
If I had to nitpick a particular downside of this case, it would be the buttons. They’re still passable, but they do require a decent bit of force — much more than early Neo Hybrid cases with their hard plastic buttons needed. If you really like the design of the case, it’s not worth passing up on, but it’s something to be wary about if you do like buttons that can be easily pressed. Also, the case is a bit difficult to install and remove, but at least that means it’s on the phone firmly once it’s installed.
I like most of Spigen’s other cases better than the Neo Hybrid, but if you’re into the look, you can’t go wrong for how low it’s priced. Just be wary if you’re a stickler for good buttons or have issues with phones and cases slipping out of your hands. The Neo Hybrid is available in gunmetal (pictured) for $13,99 and burgundy (which has a gold frame) for an extra dollar.
Verdict: Buy it if the minor flaws don’t bother you.
For those who like to retain their phone’s slim profile while still adding a bit of protection, Spigen’s Thin Fit has long been a great option. The Pixel 4 version is no different; it doesn’t really add anything new, but it didn’t really need any improvements.
As always, the Thin Fit lives up to its name. Short of the paper-thin Peel and MNML cases, this is pretty much as slim as it gets. It’s constructed of a single piece of polycarbonate and simply snaps onto the phone. The back has a nice soft-touch finish, which is fairly resistant to fingerprints. There are no buttons, just some cutouts, which I personally prefer on this style of case. The Spigen branding on the back seems to have grown a bit from the Pixel 3 Thin Fit, but it’s still pretty much unnoticeable with the black color. I’m also a big fan of the magnet insert space that Spigen provides on every Thin Fit, as it makes using it with a magnetic car mount a breeze.
If you’re looking for maximum protection, this obviously isn’t the case for you. There is a small lip on the front that might protect your screen from impact, but it does not clear a glass screen protector. It’s also missing around the buttons to make those easier to push, so that area of the front is a bit more prone to damage. The camera module gets a small hump, which is good. Of course, there’s no real shock absorption with a case like this, so you definitely want to be a bit more careful with this.
For $9.99, you really can’t go wrong with a Thin Fit. It’s nothing fancy, but it’s a great case in general for those who are a bit more careful with their phones. It’s available on Amazon for both the Pixel 4 and Pixel 4 XL in black and white (though the white colors command a premium for whatever reason).
Verdict: Buy it as long as you’re not completely clumsy.
When it comes to screen protectors, ZAGG has been in the business for longer than almost anyone else. The company currently offers three glass screen protectors for the Pixel 4 under its InvisibleShield line: Glass Elite (this one), Glass Elite VisionGuard, and Glass Elite VisionGuard+. The Glass Elite is the cheapest one, but at a $40 retail price, it’s still very expensive for a screen protector.
The Glass Elite went on very easily; all I had to do was clean the screen, lay the plastic guide tool around the phone, and drop the screen protector into place. I was also pleased that there weren’t any bubbles or air gaps on the sides — a problem entirely too common with even pricier screen protectors. However, once I started using it, I was shocked by how poor the oleophobic coating was, especially considering how much of the packaging ZAGG dedicates to talking about its “ClearPrint” technology. This is a huge problem, as there’s often so much oil on the screen that it distorts the screen’s colors. I’m not someone with especially oily hands, either. I also take issue with the inherent design of the screen protector; while I understand that the large cutout at the top leaves more margin for error during installation, it leaves the top of the phone’s glass prone to being scratched. In fact, that’s exactly what happened in my case when my phone was slid around facedown on the garage floor.
I expected a lot more for $40. ZAGG did also send me the VisionGuard and VisionGuard+, though I don’t exactly have high hopes for those more expensive offerings now, either. There is a limited lifetime warranty, but you have to cover shipping costs that you might be more inclined to put towards a cheaper, better product. I’d suggest you look elsewhere for your screen protector needs.
Recommendation: Don’t buy it.